- There’s no need for laws if freedom doesn’t exist.
- If you have knowledge, you may want to share it.
- If you don’t wish to share your knowledge, maybe you don’t actually have it.
- Freedom is an important concept for morals.
- You needn’t to come up with new words if there are already words to describe what you are saying.
- You can’t rationally prove that reason doesn’t exist.
- While mathematics can prove that matter can be infinitely divided, that’s not possible in practice.
- Hume wasn’t as skeptical as it’s often believed.
- Difference between laws and personal principles is that laws try to be universally valid.
- “Imperative” is a practical rule with a practical goal.
- An imperative is always objective.
- A “hypothetical imperative” is a practical rule that is only valid if I have means to attain the goal (the goal must be particular), but a “categorical imperative” is a practical rule that remains valid no matter if I have means to attain that goal or not (in this case, the goal is general, universal).
- Plus, a I can reject a hypothetical imperative (because the goal is particular), but, from an ethical point of view, I can not reject a categorical imperative, if it’s really categorical (because the goal is not particular).
- A practical principle (“maxim”) has personal happiness as goal.
- You are considered happy if you like your life.
- There are “delicate” pleasures, such as the intellectual ones.
- It’s your responsibility to be consistent between your actions and thoughts.
- All actions have happiness as goal.
- Being “happy” implies liking things the way they currently are (if you are unhappy with things the way they are, you may want to change them until you like them).
- Sometimes we do things thinking they would bring happiness, but we may be wrong.
- There’s no need for a law that says “love yourself”.
- You can’t expect everyone to act the way you do.
- If a categorial imperative really is categorical, it has to be universal.
- Even if everyone wants the same thing, they won’t want it the same way.
- Your will is truly free when you don’t have to care about anything other than yourself in your decision-making.
- You aren’t free from physics.
- Under the correct conditions, a strong impulse can be resisted.
- Dying for a good cause isn’t wrong.
- Before you act, think: “what if everyone else did what I’m about to do?”
- Human volition can be pure, but never holy.
- If there’s no volition, there should be no laws either.
- If my maxims take other people into account, they may be generalized.
- It’s unfair to be on the receinving end of injustice and still not do anything about it.
- Prudence is acting according to self-preservation.
- Maxims are advice, laws are orders.
- You can’t demand others to have something, such as happiness, when I don’t have that thing myself.
- Satisfaction is often out of reach.
- Some people do feel guilt for being benefited by an unfair act.
- A disporportional punishment is abuse.
- If you say that the real crime is receiving punishment, you are implying that it’s only bad if you are caught.
- A criminal who feels bad over what he did actually has a sense of morality.
- It’s also a virtue to do good deeds without feeling embarrassed or ashamed.
- If my actions are guided by a sensible goal, that goal is subjective.
- Don’t mistake cause and effect.
- Is causality an illusion?
- That doesn’t mean that truth is impossible, but that data extracted from phenomena is not absolute.
- Intellectuals tend to be more skeptical than common people.
- Affirmations based on causality aren’t absolute.
- Some people speak words that are devoid of meaning.
- The pure practical reason studies the effects of freedom.
- Your language may harm your reasoning, if it’s limited, even if your thoughts were translated into another language.
- There’s a difference between being (nature) and being (condition).
- A person can receive a painful benefit.
- You can’t make a law that says “seek pleasure and flee from pain”, because every person seeks pleasure and flees from pain in their own personal ways.
- You can’t pretend that an issue is solved if there was no conclusive debate on that.
- A person can hide their ignorance by using ambiguous words.
- Don’t give to others something you wouldn’t give to yourself.
- Empiricism often has nothing to do with morals.
- You can’t respect belongings, only people.
- When you admit that someone is superior, your reverence is sincere.
- A person can respect someone else, but without making it clear that such respect exists.
- Every limited creature can act on interest or according to maxims.
- Laws aren’t needed to do good deeds.
- There are two ways to follow a law: literally or pragmatically (achieving the same goal that the law tries to achieve, but without obeying the law literally).
- If you do your job, others should follow you as role model.
- Don’t use people as instruments: if you need someone’s help, make sure they will also get a benefit out of that.
- Duty has nothing to do with happiness.
- If there’s a problem in your reasoning and someone points it, admit your mistake.
- It’s impossible to know something “as it truly is”, but only “as my senses perceive it”.
- A person who doesn’t share their knowledge for public well-being can not be labelled a “philosopher”.
- Something is logical by identity and real by causality.
- Virtue and happiness may not converge.
- Making a poor use of reason is as valid as not using reason at all.
- There’s no interest without practical consequence.
- Faith (believing without proof) can have a rational foundation.
- Duty isn’t fear and isn’t hope.
- The value of a virtue may have no correlation with the advantage it brings.
- Self-respect originates when you realize that you are free.
- It’s freedom that gives me relevance in the universe.
- If you are going after hypothetical treasures, at least don’t neglect the real treasures.
9 de fevereiro de 2018
Kant’s “Critique of Practical Reason”.
Deixe um comentário »
Nenhum comentário ainda.
Deixe um comentário